Measuring Productivity of Citrus Hand Harvesters and Assessing Implications on Harvest Costs and Mechanical Harvesting Developments
Continuous canopy shake and catch citrus mechanical harvesting system.
view on EDIS
PDF-2013

How to Cite

Roka, Fritz M., and Barbara R. Hyman. 2013. “Measuring Productivity of Citrus Hand Harvesters and Assessing Implications on Harvest Costs and Mechanical Harvesting Developments: FE933, 5 2013”. EDIS 2013 (5). Gainesville, FL. https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-fe933-2013.

Abstract

Existing mechanical harvesters recover 70 to 95 percent of the available fruit crop. While changes can be made to increase fruit recovery percentages, mechanical systems will never equal the fruit recovery percentages from hand-harvesting crews, much less capture 100 percent of the available fruit. Whether or not to glean (to use manual labor to collect fruit not harvested by the machine) will remain an important question that growers will have to face with every block they choose to mechanically harvest. This study incorporated field harvesting data and developed a model that predicted the extent to which labor productivity would be affected by decreasing the number of oranges available for harvesting by manual labor. Given current market prices of fruit, recovery percentage of crops harvested using mechanical harvesting equipment can improve up to 99 percent and gleaning will remain a profitable activity. This 6-page fact sheet was written by Fritz M. Roka and Barbara R. Hyman and published by the UF Department of Food and Resource Economics, May 2013.

http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fe933

https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-fe933-2013
view on EDIS
PDF-2013

References

Brown, G.K. 2002. Mechanical harvesting systems for the Florida citrus juice industry. ASAE Paper 021108. Proceedings of the America Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI.

FASS. 2009. Citrus Summary 2007-08. United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Florida Agricultural Statistics Service, Orlando FL. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Florida/Publications/Citrus/cs/2007-08/cs0708all.pdf

Muraro, R.P. 2009. Southwest Florida and Central Florida Summary Budget Costs 2007-2008. University of Florida, Citrus Research and Extension Center, Lake Alfred, FL. http://www.crec.ifas.ufl.edu/extension/economics/

Roka, F.M., and B.R. Hyman. 2013. Gleaner productivity, implied piece rates, and implications for citrus mechanical harvesting. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society 125 (forthcoming).

Roka, F.M. and B.R. Hyman. 2004. Evaluating Performance of Citrus Mechanical Harvesting Systems, 2003/04. Report to the Citrus Harvesting Research Advisory Council, Lakeland, FL (August).

Unless otherwise specified, articles published in the EDIS journal after January 1, 2024 are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license.