Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
SS-AGR-133, a 5-page fact sheet by Joao Vendramini and Lynn Sollenberger, describes the advantages and disadvantages of rotational grazing vs. continuous grazing. Includes figures and references. Published by the UF Department of Agronomy, January 2007.
SS-AGR-133/AG268: Impact of Grazing Methods on Forage and Cattle Production (ufl.edu)
References
Dubeux, J.C.B., Jr., R.L. Stewart, Jr., L.E. Sollenberger, J.M.B. Vendramini, and S.M. Interrante. 2006. Spatial heterogeneity of herbage response to management intensity in continuously stocked Pensacola bahiagrass pastures. Agron. J. 98:1453-1459. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0246
Matthews, B.W., L.E. Sollenberger, and C. Staples. 1994. Dairy heifer and bermudagrass pasture responses to rotational and continuous stocking. J. Dairy Sci. 77:244-252 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)76947-2
Matthews, B.W., L.E. Sollenberger, and J.P. Tritschler II. 1996. Grazing systems and spatial distribution of nutrients in pastures - soil considerations. p. 213-229. In R.E. Joost and C.A. Roberts (ed.) Nutrient cycling in forage systems. PPI/FAR, Columbia, MO.
Mislevy, P. 2002. Forage alternatives for Florida cattle. p. 79-86. In: 51st Annual Beef Cattle Short Course Proceedings. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Stewart, R.L., Jr., J.C.B. Dubeux, Jr., L.E. Sollenberger, J.M.B. Vendramini, and S.M. Interrante. 2005. Stocking method affects plant responses of Pensacola bahiagrass pastures. Forage & Grazinglands doi: 10.1094/FG-2005-1028-01-RS. https://doi.org/10.1094/FG-2005-1028-01-RS