Consumer Perceptions of Lawn Fertilizer Brands
view on edis
PDF-2016

Keywords

Lawn Fertilizer

How to Cite

Khachatryan, Hayk, Alicia L. Rihn, and Michael D. Dukes. 2020. “Consumer Perceptions of Lawn Fertilizer Brands: FE990, 3/2016”. EDIS 2016 (3):3. https://ojs.test.flvc.org/edis/article/view/127799.

Abstract

Widespread urbanization in the United States has increased the number of lawns. A healthy lawn provides many benefits, including urban heat dissipation, water quality protection, erosion control, carbon sequestration, community safety, aesthetics, and property value growth. Many homeowners maintain their healthy lawns by applying fertilizers throughout the growing season, but excess fertilizer runoff and leaching have received much attention recently because of waterway pollution and algae blooms, leading many states to place restrictions on what chemicals can be used in lawn fertilizers. Consumers’ increased environmental awareness creates a niche opportunity for the fertilizer industry to promote environmentally friendly lawn fertilizers, but in order to effectively exploit it, industry stakeholders must understand consumer purchasing behavior before expending labor, time, and money creating products for sale. The following 3-page report written by Hayk Khachatryan, Alicia Rihn, and Michael Dukes and published by the Food and Resource Economics Department covers research methodology and the existing brand awareness and selection of consumers in the lawn fertilizer industry. It also discusses homeowners’ preferences for certain fertilizer attributes. Consumer awareness, selection, and attribute preferences indicate existing behavior, and understanding existing behavior assists in the development of effective marketing programs, promotional strategies, and policies. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fe990

view on edis
PDF-2016

References

Cox, W. 2012. New US urban area data released. Geography.com.

Hoeffler, S. and K. Lane Keller. 2003. The marketing advantages of strong brands. Journal of Brand Management 10:421-445. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540139

Kiesling F.M. and C.M. Manning. 2010. How green is your thumb? Environmental gardening identity and ecological gardening practices. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30:315-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.02.004

Yue, C., K. Hugie, and E. Watkins. 2012. Are consumers willing to pay more for low-input turfgrasses on residential lawns? Evidence from choice experiments. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 44:549-560. https://doi.org/10.1017/S107407080002410X

The documents contained on this website are copyrighted by the University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (UF/IFAS) for the people of the State of Florida. UF/IFAS retains all rights under all conventions, but permits free reproduction by all agents and offices of the Cooperative Extension Service and the people of the State of Florida. Permission is granted to others to use these materials in part or in full for educational purposes, provided that full credit is given to the UF/IFAS, citing the publication, its source, and date of publication.