Ranking Graduate Programs: Alternative Measures of Quality
Abstract
Numerical measures of quality were used to rank US graduate programs in chemical engineering. The results were compared with the reputational ranking based on a survey conducted by the National Research Council. The numerical ranking and the NRC reputational ranking are in very good agreement for the highest ranked programs, but are less well correlated for lower ranked programs. It is proposed that the numerical rankings, which are based on publications, citations, research support, and honors, are a better measure of quality, especially for smaller programs and programs whose quality is changing significantly.