Patterns of Neotropical Epiphyte Diversity
PDF

Keywords

Neotropics
epiphyte
diversity
Bolivia
Ecuador
Venezuela

How to Cite

Nieder, J., Engwald, S., & Barthlott, W. (1999). Patterns of Neotropical Epiphyte Diversity. Selbyana, 20(1), 66–75. Retrieved from https://ojs.test.flvc.org/selbyana/article/view/120397

Abstract

The authors have made extensive investigations on vascular epiphytes in the last 20 years, particularly on epiphytic vegetation in four tropical montane forest sites. These are Sehuencas (Bolivia); Otonga and Rio Guajalito (Ecuador); and La Carbonera and the Amazonian lowland forest crane plot at Rio Surumoni (Venezuela). Based on these studies, they analyze the systematic compositions and vertical and horizontal distribution patterns of epiphytes at the sites. Orchids are the most species-rich of all local epiphyte vegetation. At lowland sites, Araceae are particularly diverse. Vertical zonation of epiphytes in the canopy is a result of different ecophysiological traits. Despite marked preference for certain strata in some taxa, overlap is considerable. The differences in epiphyte diversities of montane and lowland forests can be explained by different distribution patterns. For example, in montane forests with high alpha diversity of epiphytes, species turnover between sites separated by a small geographical distance is considerable. In contrast, alpha diversity of epiphytes in the Amazonian lowlands is low, but the number of epiphyte species increases gradually with area. Although lowland forests cover vast areas, the overall epiphyte species richness is no higher than that of the wet Andean montane forests, which occupy a far smaller land surface. A tentative explanation of these differences in distribution patterns assumes different evolutionary scenarios. In the Andes, where geographical separation frequently has isolated gene pools, ecologically similar species occupy different areas. In the Amazonian lowlands, where considerable gene flow results from the mixing of populations by dispersal of diaspores and effective pollinators, fewer species have evolved. Dispersal and pollination tend to be highly effective in epiphytes because of their adaptation to the epiphytic habitat. The striking differences in diversity patterns have resulted from their evolution, which may have followed a specific path compared to terrestrial plants.

PDF

Open Access and Copyright Notice

 

Selbyana is committed to real and immediate open access for academic work. All of Selbyana's articles and reviews are free to access immediately upon publication. There are no author charges (APCs) prior to publication, and no charges for readers to download articles and reviews for their own scholarly use.  To facilitate this, Selbyana depends on the financial backing of the Marie Selby Botanical Gardens, the hard work and dedication of its editorial team and advisory board, and the continuing support of its network of peer reviewers and partner institutions.

Authors are free to choose which open license they would like to use for their work. Our default license is the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0). While Selbyana’s articles can be copied by anyone for noncommercial purposes if proper credit is given, all materials are published under an open-access license with authors retaining full and permanent ownership of their work. The author grants Selbyana a perpetual, non-exclusive right to publish the work and to include it in other aggregations and indexes to achieve broader impact and visibility.

Authors are responsible for and required to ascertain that they are in possession of image rights for any and all photographs, illustrations, and figures included in their work or to obtain publication or reproduction rights from the rights holders. Contents of the journal will be registered with the Directory of Open Access Journals and similar repositories. Authors are encouraged to store their work elsewhere, for instance in institutional repositories or personal websites, including commercial sites such as academia.edu, to increase circulation (see The Effects of Open Access).