Examining the Case of DICK’s Sporting Goods: Realignment of Stakeholders through Corporate Social Advocacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32473/jpic.v2.i2.p176Keywords:
corporate social advocacy, political activism, stakeholder theory, corporate valuesAbstract
This study examined corporate social advocacy and political activism through the case of DICK’s Sporting Goods and the company’s recent stance on gun control reform. Themes related to stakeholders, corporate values, and activism versus advocacy were explored through an interview with DICK’s President, documentation including an interview with DICK’s CEO and statements from the company, and a social media content analysis of 3,000 public tweets to DICK’s in the wake of the announcement. Findings revealed that DICK’s actions extended beyond corporate social advocacy into corporate political activism, partly driven by secondary stakeholders. This action created an opportunity for DICK’s to redefine and realign stakeholders while making corporate values clearer to these stakeholder groups.
References
Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Open University.
APCO Worldwide. (2018). Corporate advocacy, in five acts. Retrieved from http://apcoworldwide.com/docs/default-source/default-document-library/Thought-Leadership/apcos-five-acts-of-corporate-advocacy.pdf
Bakan, J. (2004). The corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power. Toronto, ON, Canada: Viking.
Baraniuk, C. (2018, March 27). How Twitter bots help fuel political feuds. Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-twitter-bots-help-fuel-political-feuds/
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders—Balancing economic, legal, and social responsibilities. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
Carroll, A. B., & Bucholtz, A. K. (2014). Business and society: Ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management (9th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage.
CBS News. (2018, June 27). Red Hen owner who ousted Sarah Sanders resigns from local business group. Retrieved from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/red-hen-owner-who-ousted-sarah-sanders-resigns-from-local-business-group-main-street-lexington-2018-06-27/
Clemensen, M. (2017). Corporate political activism: When and how should companies take a political stand? Unpublished master’s project, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota. Retrieved from https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/189490/Clemensen%2C%20Maggie%20-%20Corporate%20political%20activism.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
CNN Money. (2018, February 28). Dick's CEO: Thoughts, prayers don't do anything (C. Cuomo, Interviewer) [Audio file]. Retrieved from https://money.cnn.com/video/news/2018/02/28/dicks-sporting-goods-weapon-ban-ceo-edward-stack-new-day.cnnmoney/index.html
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. C. (2008). Basics of qualitative research, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Creswell, J., & Corkery, M. (2018, February 28). Walmart and Dick’s raise minimum age for gun buyers to 21. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/28/business/walmart-and-dicks-major-gun-retailers-will-tighten-rules-on-guns-they-sell.html
Cutler, B. D., & Muehling, D. D. (1989). Advocacy advertising and the boundaries of commercial speech. Journal of Advertising, 18(3), 40-50. doi:10.1080/00913367.1989.10673160
Dellarocas, C. (2003). The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Science, 49(10), 1407-1424. doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1407.17308.
DICK’s Sporting Goods. (2018). Media statements. Retrieved from http://pressroom.dicks.com/press-information/media-statements.aspx
Dodd, M. D., & Supa, D. W. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring “corporate social advocacy” communication: Examining the impact on corporate financial performance. Public Relations Journal, 8(3), 1-23. Retrieved from http://www.prsa.org/Intelligence/PRJournal/Vol8/No3
Dodd, M. D., & Supa, D. (2015). Testing the viability of corporate social advocacy as a predictor of purchase intention. Communication Research Reports, 32(4), 287–293. doi:10.1080/08824096.2015.1089853
Edman, H. (2010). Twittering to the top: A content analysis of corporate tweets to measure organization-public relationships. Unpublished master’s thesis, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/1726/?utm_source=digitalcommons.lsu.edu%2Fgradschool_theses%2F1726&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
Ellen, P. S., Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147-157. doi:10.1177/0092070305284976
Etter, M. (2013). Reasons for low levels of interactivity: (Non-) interactive CSR communication in Twitter. Public Relations Review, 39, 606-608. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.06.003
ExxonMobil. (2018). Our guiding principles. Retrieved from http://corporate.exxonmobil.com/en/company/about-us/guiding-principles/our-guiding-principles
Foroohar, R. (2016, June 22). Why CEOs are becoming political figures. Time. Retrieved from http://time.com/4377201/donald-trump-ceos-politics
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, pp. 32–33.
Gaines-Ross, L. (2017, October 2). Hundreds of CEOs are speaking out in the Trump era. Here are the patterns. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2017/10/what-ceo-activism-looks-like-in-the-trump-era
Gaither, B. M., Austin, L., & Schulz, M. (2018). Delineating CSR and social change: Querying corporations as actors for social good. Public Relations Inquiry, 7(1), 45-61. doi:10.1177/2046147X17743544
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: de Gruyter.
Heath, R. L., & Nelson, R. A. (1986). Issues management: Corporate public policymaking in an information society. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
Heath, R. L., & Palenchar, M. J. (2009). Strategic issues management (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Isidore, C. (2018, Feb 28). Dick's Sporting Goods will stop selling assault-style rifles. Retrieved from http://money.cnn.com/2018/02/28/news/companies/dicks-weapon-ban/index.html
Johnson, J., & Wagner, J. (2017, August 12). Trump condemns Charlottesville violence but doesn’t single out white nationalists. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-condemns-charlottesville-violence-but-doesnt-single-out-white-nationalists/2017/08/12/933a86d6-7fa3-11e7-9d08-
b79f191668ed_story.html?utm_term=.22ddd706131e
Kim, S. Y., & Reber, B. H. (2008). Public relations’ place in corporate social responsibility: Practitioners define their role. Public Relations Review 34, 337-342. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.07.003
King, B. (2008). A social movement perspective of stakeholder collective action and influence. Business & Society, 47(1), pp. 21-49. doi:10.1177/0007650307306636
Korschun, D. (2017, February 7). Companies that stay silent on political issues can pay a hefty price. Fast Company. Retrieved from https://www.fastcompany.com/3067944/political-neutrality-can-be-costly
Korschun, D., Aggarwal, A., Rafieian, H., & Swain, S. D. (2016). Taking a stand: Consumer responses to corporate political activism. Retrieved from SSRN website: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2806476 doi:10.2139/ssrn.2806476.
Krippendorff, K. (2004a). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Krippendorff, K. (2004b). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3),411–433. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x
McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (Eds.). (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements. New York, NY: Cambridge University.
McPherson, P. (2018, January 12). 8 Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) trends to look for in 2018. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/susanmcpherson/2018/01/12/8-corporate-social-responsibility-csr-trends-to-look-for-in-2018/#34ceb08140ce
Nielsen. (2015). The Nielsen global survey of corporate social responsibility and sustainability. Retrieved from Nielsen website: https://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/nielsenglobal/dk/docs/global-sustainability-report-oct-2015.pdf
O’Connor, C. (2014, March 19). Chick-fil-A CEO Cathy: Gay marriage still wrong, but I’ll shut up about it and sell chicken. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2014/03/19/chick-fil-a-ceo-cathy-gay-marriage-still-wrong-but-ill-shut-up-about-it-and-sell-chicken
Potter, J. W. (1996). An analysis of thinking and research about qualitative methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Reilly, K. (2018, February 28). Walmart is the latest example of a company doing what politicians won’t on gun control. Time. Retrieved from http://time.com/5179510/walmart-firearms-dicks-sporting-goods-gun-policy
Reiter, S. L. (2016). Corporate profit, social welfare, and the logic of capitalism. Business and Society Review, 121(3), 331-363. doi:10.1111/basr.12090
Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22, 887-910. doi:10.2307/259248
Sethi, S. P. (1975). Dimensions of corporate social performance: An analytical framework. California Management Review, 17(3), 58-64. doi:10.2307/41162149
Sethi, S. P. (1977). Advocacy advertising and large corporations: Social conflict, big business image, the news media, and public policy. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
Sethi, S. P. (1979). A conceptual framework for environmental analysis of social
issues and evaluation of business response patterns. Academy of Management
Review, 4(1), 63–74.
Simpson, W. G., & Kohers, T. (2002). The link between corporate social and financial performance: Evidence from the banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(2), 97-109. doi:10.1023/A:1013082525900
Smith, A. (2018, May 30). Dick’s soaring sales prove it can succeed without assault rifles. Retrieved from http://money.cnn.com/2018/05/30/news/companies/dicks-sporting-goods-earnings/index.html
Snider, J., Hill, R. P., & Martin, D. (2003). Corporate social responsibility in the 21st century: A view from the world’s most successful firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(2), 175–187. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000004606.29523.db
Stack, E. W. (2018, March 21). Opinion | I run Dick’s Sporting Goods. It’s Congress’s turn to do something about guns. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/i-run-dicks-sporting-goods-its-congresss-turn-to-do-something-about-guns/2018/03/21/3dd1b040-2c3f-11e8-b0b0-f706877db618_story.html
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Thomas, P. N. (2014). Development communication and social change in historical context. In K. G. Wilkins, T. Tufte, & R. Obregon (Eds.), The handbook of development communication and social change (pp. 5-19). New York, NY: John & Wiley Sons.
Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Davis, C. A., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2017). Online human-bot interactions: Detection, estimation, and characterization. Proceedings from the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, pp. 280-289. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.03107
Weber Shandwick. (2017). CEO activism in 2017: High noon in the C-Suite. Weber Shandwick & KRC Research. Retrieved from Weber Shandwick website: http://www.webershandwick.com/uploads/news/files/ceo-activism-in-2017-high-noon-in-the-c-suite.pdf
Wong, J. C. (2017, January 20). Mark Zuckerberg challenges Trump on immigration and “extreme vetting” order. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/jan/27/mark-zuckerberg-donald-trump-immigration-order-facebook
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
By submitting to the Journal of Public Interest Communications, the author(s) agree to the terms of the Author Agreement. All authors retain copyrights associated with their article contributions and agree to make such contributions available under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY NC) 4.0 upon publication.
Author Agreement
This agreement takes effect upon acceptance of the Submission for publication in JPIC.
- I hereby grant to the University of Florida (“the University”) the non-exclusive right to retain, reproduce and distribute the Submission in whole or in part, in print and electronic format and in any medium. This agreement does not represent a transfer of copyright to the University.
- The University may make and keep multiple copies of the work for purposes of security, backup, preservation and access; and may migrate the work to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation and access.
- I represent and warrant to the University that the work is my original work and that I have the authority as sole author or I have the authority on behalf of my co-authors to grant the rights contained in this agreement. I also represent that the work does not, to the best of my knowledge, infringe or violate any rights of others.
- I further represent and warrant that I have obtained all necessary rights to permit the University to reproduce and distribute the work, including any third-party material. Alternatively, I represent that my use of any third-party material is allowed because the material is not in copyright or I have performed a fair use analysis and reasonably believe my use is permitted. Any content owned by a third party is clearly identified and acknowledged within the work.
- I grant these same rights to the George A. Smathers Libraries at the University of Florida. Additionally, I grant the right to both the University and Smathers Libraries to enter into agreements with third-party entities and the rights necessary to host, print, index and abstract the Submission.
Open Access and Self-Archiving
JPIC follows an open-access publishing model, meaning that all articles will be publicly accessible on the Internet immediately upon publication. I understand that I may share the submitted manuscript (preprint) of the Submission on the Internet at any point before or after publication, with a citation and link to the final version of record to be added as soon as the issue is available. I may disseminate the final peer-reviewed version at any point after publication.
Creative Commons License
JPIC applies a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY NC) 4.0 to encourage sharing and reuse of content and to maximize the impact of published research. By publishing in JPIC, I agree that the terms of this license will be applied to the Submission. Smathers Libraries (copyright@uflib.ufl.edu) may be able to offer additional information.
By granting this license, I acknowledge that I have read and agreed to the terms of this agreement.
