Impregnating Activated Carbon with Iron Salts to Increase Hydrogen Sulfide Removal
Keywords:activated carbon, hydrogen sulfide, landfills
Hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) emissions from landfills negatively impact surrounding communities. In addition to an unpleasant, rotten-egg odor, inhalation of the gas can cause respiratory distress and irritation. Peak emissions are released from C&D landfills through the decomposition of gypsum drywall. Current removal technologies are costly and often ineffective. The goal of this research was to develop a cost-effective mat geared toward H₂S removal. Preliminary research revealed an increase in adsorption capacity through the addition of iron salts, FeCl3 and FeSO4, to activated carbon at a 5:1 carbon to iron ratio. To evaluate the effect of heat treatments on iron oxide formation, and subsequent adsorption capacity, samples were divided into heat treatment groups of 250ºC, 450ºC, and 650ºC. Samples were flushed with 100 ppm of H₂S under N₂ at 250 ml/min for two hours. Over this time duration, samples subjected to higher temperature heat treatments showed increased adsorption capacity. All heat treated samples demonstrated higher adsorption compared to the baseline non-heat treated samples. Additional research will be conducted to assess the effect of heat treatments above 650ºC.
Anstine, J., Property Values in a Low Populated Area when Dual Noxious Facilities are Present, Growth and Change, 2003, 34, 345-58.
Bagreev, A., Menendez, J., Dukhno, I., Tarasenko, Y., & Bandosz, T. (2004). Carbon, 42(3), 469-476.
Bandosz, T., Bagreev, A., Adib, F., & Turk, A. (2000). Unmodified versus caustics- impregnated carbons for control of hydrogen sulfide emissions from sewage treatment plants. Environmental Science and Technology, 34(6), 1069-1074.
Bleich, D.H., M.C. Findley and G.M. Phillips, An Evaluation of the Impact of a Well-Designed Landfill on Surrounding Property Values, The Appraisal Journal, 1991, April, 247-52.
Boppart, S. (2010). Impregnated carbons for the adsorption of H₂S and Mercaptans. Norit Americas Inc, 1-5.
Cherosky, P., Li, Y. (2013). Hydrogen sulfide removal from biogas by bio-based iron sponge. Biosystems Engineering, 114, 55-59.
EPA. (2017, January 27). Municipal Solid Waste Landfills. Retrieved 2009, from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: https://www.epa.gov/landfills/municipal-solid-wastelandfills
Faulconer, E. K., & Mazyck, D. W. (2012, January 15). Optimization of Magnetic Powdered Activated Carbon for Aqueous Hg(II) Removal and Magnetic Recovery. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 199-200.
Innovation Waste Services. (2012). Data Gap Analysis and Damage Case Studies: Risk Analyses from Construction and Demolition Debris Landfills and Recycling Facilities. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Retrieved from EPA Science Inventory: https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?dirEntryId=311171
Liu, R. (2017). Removal of hydrogen sulfide from landfill using ferrous coated activated carbon. University of Florida.
Marsh, H., & Rodriguez-Reinoso, F. (2006). Activated Carbon (1st Edition ed.). Elsevier Science.
Reed, B. E., Vaughan, R., & Jiang, L. (2000, September). As(III), As(V), Hg, and Pb Removal by FeOxide Impregnated Activated Carbon. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 126(9).
Rodriguez, J., Charturvedi, S., Kuhn, M., & Hrbeck, J. (1998). Reaction of H2S and S2 with metal/oxide surfaces: band-gap size and chemical reactivity. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 102(28), 5511-5519.
Ruth, J. H. (1986). Odor Thresholds and Irritation Levels of Several Chemical Substances. Wausau Insurance Companies, San Francisco, CA.
Townsend, T. G., Chadik, P., Bitton, G., Booth, M., Lee, S., & Yang, K. (2000). gypsum drywall impact on odor production at landfills: science and control strategies. Florida Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste Management, Gainesville, FL.
Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Han, L., Chang, L., & Bao, W. (2013). Simultaneous removal of hydrogen sulfide and mercury from simulated syngas by iron-based sorbents. Fuel, 103, 73-79.
Some journals stipulate that submitted articles cannot be under consideration for publication or published in another journal. The student-author and mentor have the option of determining which journal the paper will be submitted to first. UF JUR accepts papers that have been published in other journals or might be published in the future. It is the responsibility of the student-author and mentor to determine whether another journal will accept a paper that has been published in UF JUR.